Your are here: Home > Blog

Wyse Xenith – 5 Minutes to Xen

November 8th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | VDI | Virtualization | Wyse | XenDesktop - (1 Comments)

In our interview with the “Wyse guys,” they talked about the Xenith “zero client” terminal. To clarify, “zero client” doesn’t mean that there’s no local operating system in the device. It means that you – or better yet, your end user – can literally take one out of the box, plug it in, turn it on, and have it up and running with absolutely no need to do anything to configure it. Wyse says you can have it out of the box and running in five minutes. It took us about three…and we weren’t particularly hurrying.

The one thing you do have to do is to configure a DHCP option that will provide a pointer to your config.xml file. When you turn the Xenith on, it will query your DHCP server, and along with the basic stuff like the IP address, subnet mask, default gateway, and DNS settings, the DHCP server will, through the option you configure, provide the Xenith with the URL of your Citrix Web Interface server and the path to the config.xml file. The Xenith boots so fast that by the time your monitor wakes up and syncs to the video signal, you’re looking at a login prompt.

In this video, Steve Parlee of Moose Logic and Dave Jolley of Wyse walk you through the process of configuring the necessary DHCP option, and then demonstrate how easy it is to take a new Xenith out of the box and be up and running with a virtual desktop.

, , , , ,

Citrix Announces XenDesktop 5

October 6th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | Citrix Synergy | VDI | Virtualization | XenDesktop - (0 Comments)

Earlier today, at Citrix Synergy in Berlin, Citrix announced XenDesktop 5, which is scheduled for availability in December, 2010. Naturally, we went looking for the “what’s new” list. You can find that list on the Citrix Web site, but, just to save you a few clicks, here’s our take on it.

Most of the user-facing features are evolutionary, as opposed to revolutionary. There have been incremental improvements in devices supported by the Citrix Receiver, the performance of Citrix HDX, user self-service provisioning, and single sign-on. There is also support for XenClient and XenVault, which were recently made available for download as part of XenDesktop 4, Feature Pack 2. But the truly revolutionary, knock-your-socks-off features are on the management side.

Installation and deployment of a large XenDesktop environment is now a snap using the new Desktop Studio tool. Since a video is worth a thousand words, check out the following video demo of Desktop Studio:

But wait! That’s not all! There’s something here for the help desk staff as well, and this may be the coolest part of all. Take a look at a demo of the new Desktop Director tool:

One of Citrix’s stated goals with XenDesktop 5 is to take VDI from “wow” to “how” – to show you how to easily install, scale, and manage a desktop virtualization deployment. Desktop Studio and Desktop Director are huge steps in that direction.

, , , , , ,

Desktop Virtualization for the SMB

September 16th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Best Practices | Citrix | VDI | Virtualization | Windows 7 | XenDesktop - (3 Comments)

One of the criticisms that’s been leveled at XenDesktop by its competitors is that it is too complex – too many components that have to be configured to get everything to work. And while that’s partially true, it’s not the whole story. As we’ve discussed in previous posts, XenDesktop is extremely flexible in that it allows you to mix and match different kinds of virtual desktops in your environment to best meet the needs of various groups of users. As you bring more kinds of virtual desktops into the mix, you add more infrastructure components to manage them. More infrastructure components = more complexity but also more flexibility.

If you don’t need all that flexibility – if, for example, you just want to deploy “classic” VDI, by which I mean a bunch of virtual PCs running on the hypervisor of your choice – then you don’t need all that complexity, either.

In this video, Dan Feller of Citrix presents a reference architecture for a straightforward VDI deployment of up to 500 users. The video takes about 50 minutes to watch, but it’s worth your time. You’ll learn some interesting things.

For example, you’ll note that Dan is recommending that the XenServers in the XenServer pool that supports the virtual Windows 7 machines should have local disk drives, in a RAID 10 configuration, that will be used for the local host cache for the provisioned Windows 7 systems, for two reasons: First, it’s less expensive than using SAN storage. Second, the limiting factor for how many virtual PCs you will be able to run on a XenServer host is not processing power, and it’s not RAM – it’s IOPS. And he walks you through the calculation of how many functional IOPS the local storage on the XenServer can support, and how many virtual desktops you can therefore reasonably expect to support.

In fact, my only reservation about this video is that, like just about every other discussion I’ve seen regarding Windows 7 virtualization, it doesn’t mention the Microsoft license activation issue that’s inherent in provisioning Vista and Windows 7 desktops, the need for the Microsoft Key Management Service, and the nuances of getting KMS to work properly. But we’ve pummeled that issue elsewhere in this blog.

So, with that in mind, heeeerrrrrreeee’s Dan (P.S.: the audio doesn’t start until about 15 seconds into the video):

, , , , ,

The Cost of a Windows 7 Migration

September 8th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | Microsoft | VDI | Virtualization | Windows 7 | XenApp | XenClient | XenDesktop - (1 Comments)

According to an August 26 Gartner press release, your Windows 7 migration may have a painful impact on your budget. The heart of the problem is summed up in this quote from Gartner managing vice president Charles Smulders:

Corporate IT departments typically prefer to migrate PC operating systems (OSs) via hardware attrition, which means bringing in the new OS as they replace hardware through a normal refresh cycle. Microsoft will support Windows XP for four more years. With most migrations not starting until the fourth quarter of 2010 at the earliest, and PC hardware replacement cycles typically running at four to five years, most organizations will not be able to migrate to Windows 7 through usual planned hardware refresh before support for Windows XP ends.

Because of this time crunch, Gartner says that you really have only one of three options:

  1. Accelerate your PC replacement schedule. This obviously will impact your capital budget.
  2. Upgrade some of your existing PCs. Unfortunately, not all of your PCs are likely to support Windows 7 without some upgrades. In fact, Gartner estimates that 25% of the installed base of PCs will require some kind of hardware upgrade to run Windows 7. Also, unless you’re prepared to stretch out the life of these upgraded PCs beyond your usual upgrade cycle, those users are going to end up being migrated twice, not once, during the next four years. Gartner’s estimate of the migration cost per PC, assuming a large enterprise with 10,000 PCs where all PCs are upgraded: between $1,274 and $2,069, depending on how well-managed the environment is to begin with, which, by the way, is not a heck of a lot less than their estimated migration cost if you do just replace them.
  3. Migrate some users to a “hosted virtual desktop” instead of a new PC.

If you’ve been following this blog for any length of time, you know were we stand on the “hosted virtual desktop” issue. To most people, the term “hosted virtual desktop” refers to a virtual instance of a PC OS (e.g., Windows 7) running on a virtualized infrastructure such as VMware, Hyper-V, or XenServer. However, this is only one way to deliver a virtual desktop to a user. Other ways include:

  • Delivering a shared desktop from a server using Remote Desktop Services and XenApp (we’ve been doing this for years).
  • Streaming the PC OS from a common, shared image to a physical PC across the local area network. (Note that this would still require that the hardware in the physical PC be able to support the new OS.)
  • Streaming the PC OS to a client-side hypervisor (XenClient) so the client device can be disconnected from the network and continue to operate.

We’re also of the opinion that no single one of these approaches will fit all use cases. But the nice thing about Citrix XenDesktop is that you can mix and match any and all of these use cases to the needs of your users, all under a single license model.

It still isn’t going to be inexpensive. As Gartner points out, you have to build the virtual infrastructure to deliver those desktops, which will involve both capital costs and labor costs. Anyone who tells you that VDI will save you money in immediate capital costs compared with buying new PCs is not being straight with you. But you can, according to other studies, save up to 40% in your “Total Cost of Ownership” (“TCO”).

And your other alternatives aren’t inexpensive either. So why not take advantage of this opportunity to change the way you deploy and manage PCs? Take a look at what you can do with XenDesktop today, think about how much easier and less costly your Windows 7 roll out would be if you already had XenDesktop in place, and then think about how much easier and less costly your next major PC upgrade project will be if you deploy XenDesktop now.

Windows 7 is going to impact your budget one way or another. Gartner estimates that if you just decide to accelerate your upgrade cycle, the percentage of your IT budget that you spend on PCs will need to increase somewhere between 20% and 60% in 2011 and 2012. If, as in many organizations, your PC spending accounts for 15% of your overall IT budget, that means that in 2011 and 2012 you’re going to be spending between 18% and 25% of your budget on PCs instead of 15%. And that will impact other projects.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, Gartner also predicts that the demand for “highly qualified Windows 7 migration IT personnel” will exceed supply in 2011 and 2012. Remember those discussions about supply & demand back in Economics 101? Yep, that means that IT labor costs are going to go up. In fact, Gartner predicts that the labor shortage, and higher costs, will persist into 2013 as organizations realize that they’re behind in their planned migration schedule and try to figure out what to do about it.

Mr. Smulders had a recommendation on that as well: “Begin talks with suppliers now about putting in place contracts that can deliver flexible levels of resources at a fixed rate over the migration period.”

If you want to purchase a copy of the full report from Gartner, you can order one through their Web site. Or, if you just want to take Mr. Smulders’ advice, you can reach us at (206) 774-0619, or by email at sales@mooselogic.com, or by using our handy information request form. We’re here to help.

, , , , , , , , ,

More on Provisioning Services and KMS

August 17th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | Licensing | Microsoft | Provisioning Services | VDI | Virtualization | XenDesktop - (3 Comments)

Last fall, we posted about Citrix Provisioning Services and Microsoft KMS activation. To briefly recap, here’s the issue:

  • When you convert a Windows 7 OS image to a shared image for provisioning, it breaks the Microsoft license key.
  • The way you deal with that is to use Microsoft’s Key Management Services (KMS) to auto-activate systems as they boot.
  • A KMS server must have a minimum number of systems checking in for activation before it will activate anything (5 different server systems must check in before it will begin activating servers, and an aggregate of 25 servers and/or workstations must check in before it will begin activating workstations.)
  • If your KMS server is running on Windows Server 2008 R2, both physical and virtual systems will increment the counter. If it’s running on an earlier server version, only physical systems will increment the counter.

In the comment thread of that earlier post, “Chris” stated that he was trying to use Provisioning Server to provision Windows 7 systems, but that they were not incrementing the counter on the KMS server. It turns out that he was absolutely right, and I thought this was important enough to bump the issue by writing another post rather than just going back and commenting on the older one.

It turns out that, although Provisioning Server changes the host name as systems boot, it does not change the machine ID (“CMID”). And, unfortunately, the CMID is what a KMS server looks at to determine whether a machine that’s checking in is a new one that hasn’t previously checked in. Therefore, all of your provisioned Windows 7 systems will look to the KMS server like the same system checking in over and over again, and will not continue to increment the threshold counter.

According to a blog post by Thomas Koetzing a couple of weeks ago, Citrix has told him that this will be fixed in the next release of Provisioning Services, scheduled for sometime in Q4.

Frankly, I’m pretty disappointed by this whole issue. Windows 7 has been out now for almost a year. The big push by both Citrix and Microsoft is that XenDesktop is a great way to roll out Windows 7. Provisioning Services is a must for any significant VDI deployment, because otherwise you eat up far too much of your expensive SAN storage. But yet we’re still stuck in a situation where we can’t use Provisioning Services to provision Windows 7 unless we have at least 25 physical systems checking in with our KMS server for activation. In my opinion, there is no excuse for this issue not being addressed long ago…particularly when it’s been a known issue since the release of Windows Vista.

I did find a workaround described by Kirk Kosinski in a Citrix forum post:

What I did was create a VM with VL media, sysprep and power off, convert to a template, then deploy the template 25 times and boot each VM once (a few required a reboot before contacting the KMS for whatever reason). My KMS server could then activate clients successfully, at least for a while… the activation count will decrease over time if the machine doesn’t contact the KMS server, so you will periodically need to redo this process.

The VMs don’t have to join the domain to activate so you don’t need a complicated sysprep script, just make sure to not include any license key in the script…

This strikes me as a bit of a pain, particularly when you’ve got to do it every six months or so to keep your systems alive, but it should at least work until Citrix and Microsoft get this sorted out.

, , , , , , ,

Citrix Synchronizer and XenClient Demo

August 9th, 2010 | Posted by Shane Kalles in Citrix | Education | VDI | Virtualization | XenClient - (0 Comments)

Over the past few months, we’ve made several posts about XenClient. But in case you haven’t read them, or you need to refresh your memory, XenClient is (quoting from Citrix here): “…a high-performance, bare-metal hypervisor that runs directly on the client device hardware, dividing up the resources of the machine and enabling multiple operating systems to run side by side in complete isolation.”

Of course, there are other ways to run multiple operating systems side by side on a client device, although they may not give you the level of performance that XenClient – because of its small footprint – brings to the table. The tricky part is figuring out how to manage that environment once the user unplugs the laptop from the network and takes it on the road. How do you patch it? How do you back up user data? What do you do if the laptop is lost or stolen? If one of the OS instances is corrupted, or accidentally deleted, how do you get it back?

That’s the job of the Citrix Synchronizer – a virtual appliance that runs back in your data center and communicates with your XenClient-equipped laptops securely (via SSL) over the Internet. But rather than try to describe to you in detail exactly how that all works, it’s probably easier to simply show you. So take a few minutes to watch our own Steve Parlee demonstrate the interaction between Synchronizer and XenClient.

, , , ,

The Trade Up Is Dead – Long Live the Trade Up!

July 13th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | Licensing | VDI | Virtualization | XenDesktop - (0 Comments)

As we told you many times, and in many ways, the special Citrix XenDesktop Trade-Up promotion ended on June 30. However, as we expected, Citrix has announced a new trade-up promotion. So there is still a migration path from XenApp to XenDesktop, although (as we also expected) it will cost you more than it would have had you acted before June 30.

You can still get the two-for-one deal if (1) your Subscription Advantage is current, and (2) you trade up all of your XenApp licenses.

Citrix has also extended the trade-up offer to customers who own XenApp Fundamentals (a.k.a. Access Essentials), which is great news. Under the earlier promo, these customers would have had to upgrade to XenApp Enterprise first, and then trade up to XenDesktop. Now they can trade up for the same price as customers who own XenApp Advanced Edition (although the two-for-one deal is not available for XenApp Fundamentals).

Here’s the pricing matrix for the new promo, which will run through December 31, 2010 (click graphic to view full size):

XenDesktop Trade Up Pricing, July 1 - Dec 31, 2010

XenDesktop Trade Up Pricing, July 1 - Dec 31, 2010

, , , , ,

Seven Days and Counting

June 23rd, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | Licensing | VDI | Virtualization | XenApp | XenDesktop - (1 Comments)

Just in case you haven’t heard, there’s one week to go on the Citrix XenDesktop 4 Trade-Up Promotion. Here’s a quick recap:

  • The XenDesktop 4 Enterprise and Platinum Editions include all of the functionality of the corresponding XenApp edition. In other words, if you buy XenApp licenses today, you get XenApp. If you buy XenDesktop licenses, you get XenDesktop and XenApp.
  • …however, the license model changes: XenApp licenses have always been – and continue to be – based on concurrent use. If you own 100 XenApp licenses, it doesn’t make any difference how many users hit your XenApp farm, you’re just limited to a maximum of 100 at any given time. XenDesktop Enterprise and Platinum licenses are non-concurrent – they are either per user or per device (your choice).
  • …on the other hand, XenDesktop licenses are only about half the price per license as XenApp licenses. That means if your concurrency ratio (the ratio of total users to concurrent users) is less than 2-to-1, you’re better off buying XenDesktop licenses even if all you plan to use today is XenApp! You’ll pay less money, and you’ll have all that XenDesktop functionality in your back pocket ready to be deployed when you’re ready.
  • The current trade-up promotion allows you to convert your existing XenApp licenses to XenDesktop licenses at a price that you will probably never see again. This promotion is ending June 30.
  • If your Citrix Subscription Advantage is current, and you trade up all of your XenApp licenses, Citrix will give you two XenDesktop licenses for every XenApp license you trade up. E.g., if you have 100 XenApp licenses, your Subscription Advantage is current, and you trade up all 100 of them, you’ll end up with 200 XenDesktop licenses.
  • If your Subscription Advantage has been expired for a while, you may find that it’s less expensive to trade up to XenDesktop (which will come with a year of Subscription Advantage) than to pay the fee to get Subscription Advantage reinstated on your XenApp licenses. You won’t get the 2-for-1 deal, so you’ll have to look closely at whether the new license model will mean you have to buy additional licenses, which will obviously affect whether or not the total cost is advantageous to you, but it’s worth running the numbers to find out.
  • If the Subscription Advantage renewal on your XenApp licenses is coming due soon, consider the benefits of redirecting those renewal dollars to help pay for the trade-up. That can make an already-sweet deal even sweeter.

Citrix has a helpful on-line trade-up calculator that you can use to help you compare costs. You’ll need to enter (1) how many XenApp licenses you own, (2) how many of them you want to trade up, (3) what version of XenApp you own, (4) what version of XenDesktop you want to trade up to, and (5) whether or not your Subscription Advantage is current.

I suppose it’s possible that, come July 1, Citrix will announce that they’re extending the promotion…but I doubt it. So far, everyone I’ve talked to at Citrix has assured me that it will not be extended. I’m sure that there will still be an upgrade path after July 1, but it will cost you more money than the current promotion.

One more thing – if you’re going to do this, please don’t wait until the afternoon of June 30 to issue your purchase order! June 30 is like the “triple witching hour” – it’s end-of-month, end-of-quarter, and end-of-promotion. So it’s bound to be crazy busy in the Citrix order entry department. We’ve been requesting that all of our customers get their orders to us by end of business on the 29th, just to make sure that we can get the order placed through distribution and into Citrix’s hands before end of business in Fort Lauderdale on the 30th.

P.S.: We’re frequently asked why Citrix is making the change to non-concurrent licensing for XenDesktop. The main rationale is that if you’re looking at a serious desktop virtualization initiative, your concurrency ratio is probably going to be close to 1-to-1 anyway, so you won’t get much benefit from a concurrent license model. It also aligns more closely with the Microsoft VDI licensing model.

The important thing to remember is that if you are in that situation, you’ll actually spend less money and get more functionality for it, because the XenDesktop licenses will cost you roughly half of what it would cost to buy an equivalent number of XenApp licenses.

And if your use case is primarily to support a large pool of remote users, but you will never have more than half of them logged on at any given time, you can still purchase XenApp licenses to support those users, and they will still be concurrent use licenses.

, , , , , , ,

A First Look At XenClient

June 4th, 2010 | Posted by Steve Parlee in Citrix | VDI | Virtualization | XenClient - (1 Comments)

If you’ve following our blog for a while, you know that XenClient is the new client-side hypervisor from Citrix. It’s purpose is to allow you to take your virtual desktop with you and still have an elegant way to keep it up to date and to synch your important documents. We’ve been testing the “Release Candidate” that Citrix recently made available as a public beta.

Even though it is obviously not finished code, it’s pretty impressive!

Our Dell Latitude demo system is configured with two VMs – one Windows 7 and the other Windows XP. Further I have Access 2003 installed on the XP image and Access 2007 installed on the Win7 image and I’m “passing through” Access 2003 from the XP VM to the Win7 VM. In other words, I can “publish” an application from one desktop – in this case, I’m publishing Access 2003 from the XP desktop – and “subscribe” to it from the other desktop. In practice, this is similar in appearance to how a XenApp published application looks when it runs on the client device.

There are a couple of advantages to this. The obvious one is that an application that won’t run on Win7 can be installed on the XP desktop and made available to the Win7 desktop. A more subtle advantage is in the area of security. For example, let’s assume that the XP desktop is your “business desktop,” and is locked down such that the user has no administrative rights. Let’s further assume that the Win7 desktop is your “personal desktop,” and you have the rights to do whatever you want with it – which could include getting infected with malware. But the applications running on the business desktop cannot be affected by malware on the personal desktop – even if they’re being passed through.

In an earlier blog post, we linked to a Citrix TV video that demonstrated this “secure application sharing.” In that video, they’ve deliberately infected one desktop with a keylogger. You can see that any interaction with a browser running on that desktop is being logged by the keylogger. However, a browser session that is running on the other desktop, but being passed through to the infected desktop, is immune to the keylogger. Pretty cool.

With regards to functionality, I’m very hopeful that Citrix will fix some of the issues we’ve seen in the RC. Here are some of the things we’ve seen reported on the Citrix on-line forums, some of which we’ve seen ourselves:

  • Many people are finding hardware problems with simple devices such as mice even for hardware on the Hardware Compatibility List. Smart cards are also an issue.
  • XenClient requires that a few different Virtualization technologies be present in order to function correctly, so today the HCL is pretty limited. This should be improving each day but it is still something to watch out for so be sure to check the HCL carefully. There is an HCL included with the XenClient 1.0 RC User Guide.
  • HDX (High Definition) video/audio:
    • If you run both a corporate Desktop and a Personal desktop at the same time, only one VM can have HDX running at a time – and to switch HDX functionality between VMs you have to shut them down…it cannot be done on the fly. This is unfortunate because without HDX, video is really choppy and difficult to watch. Citrix has already said this will not change before RTM (Release to Manufacturing).
    • If you are taking advantage of the feature we described earlier where you publish an application from one desktop and subscribe to it from the other, you can have HDX running in the subscribing desktop, but not in the publishing desktop.
  • We’ve not yet been able to do a successful physical-to-virtual (“P2V”) migration of a desktop OS into the XenClient environment. Citrix has said it will release a version of XenConvert that will be able to do this, but they say it probably won’t be until after RTM.
  • Integrated video cams do not work. This could be a significant issue, since the product is aimed at “road warriors” and many of them will want to use a cam for meeting. It supposedly supports USB video cams, but we have not yet tested this. However, I’m concerned that many users will push back on having to carry an extra peripheral with them. We’ve been told by Citrix that this should be working by RTM.
  • OS Snapshots are not available yet but should be in a future release.
  • No support for 64 bit guests yet.
  • Graphic support for non-Intel graphic chip sets is limited.

Still, this is shaping up to be a great product that will make life easier for many a desktop administrator. If you’ve ever had to manage desktops, you’ve had to deal with this “Catch-22:”

  1. My users are breaking their desktops…I need to lock them down.
  2. When I lock them down, I end up with managers in my face because they can’t install their favorite (fill in the blank).
  3. I back off and give them local admin rights so they can install (fill in the blank).
  4. Return to Step 1, repeat ad nauseum.

XenClient gives us a glimmer of hope that we may be able, sometime soon, to break out of this cycle!

, , , ,

Five Cool Products from Synergy 2010

May 18th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Application streaming | Application Virtualization | Citrix | Citrix Synergy | Provisioning Services | VDI | Virtualization | XenDesktop - (1 Comments)

As many readers know, I spent last week attending back-to-back Citrix conferences in San Francisco. Monday and Tuesday (“Summit”) was for Citrix Partners, Wednesday through Friday (“Synergy”) was for the larger user community. In the coming days, I expect to be writing a lot about stuff I learned there – to the extent that I can without violating the Non-Disclosure Agreement that all attendees agree to as part of the registration process.

Today’s post is about five cool products that I think are worthy of further investigation. I should stress that, aside from Wyse, we do not currently sell any of these vendors’ products, and we may or may not partner with them in the future. So this should not be interpreted as an endorsement other than to say that these products intrigued me and I believe them to be worth looking into.

Wyse XenithTM “Zero Client”
Finally, a non-Windows-based thin-client device with HDX MediaStream video support! I can hardly wait for us to get our hands on one of these for testing. Up until now, if you wanted high performance video, you needed to buy a Windows-embedded thin-client, and install the same Citrix Receiver and plug-ins that you would install on a full-blown desktop PC. And, unfortunately, a Windows-embedded thin-client can easily cost as much as a low-end PC. While I don’t have firm cost numbers yet, I was told it would be “sub-$300” (which I assume to mean $299).

At the Wyse demo, they plugged in the box, turned it on, it auto-discovered the XenDesktop infrastructure and automatically configured itself accordingly, and was ready to use literally in a few seconds. Wow.

Kaviza’s “VDI-In-a-Box”
Kaviza has an intriguing product. It won the “Best of Synergy” award in the “Business Efficiency” category. As the product name implies, they make a virtual appliance that handles the provisioning, load-balancing, and management of virtual desktops in a single package. Their original appliance was designed to run on VMware, but the Beta of v3.0 they were showing at Synergy will run on XenServer. They do not require shared storage (i.e., a SAN), or a separate connection broker. When you add more of their appliances, their “grid” automatically reconfigures itself to incorporate the new appliances, replicating desktop template images as required.

They’re positioning this as an SMB solution – up to a couple hundred desktops. If you’re going to grow beyond that, you’re probably going to want the greater storage efficiency of storing your desktop images on a SAN and using the provisioning services of XenDesktop 4. Also, this is specifically a VDI solution, by which I mean a bunch of virtual PCs running on one or more virtualization hosts. As we’ve discussed in other posts, VDI is only one kind of desktop virtualization. If you want the flexibility of being able to leverage all the different kinds of desktop virtualization, XenDesktop gives you that flexibility.

Suggested list price is $125 per concurrent user. Citrix has a VDI-only version of XenDesktop (which does include provisioning services, but does not include any other form of desktop virtualization) which lists for $95 per named user, or $195 per concurrent user. So, taking into account the cost savings from reducing the back-end infrastructure requirements, Kaviza is certainly competitive for smaller deployments, if you’re looking for strictly a VDI solution. Kavisa estimates that, including the virtualization hosts, you’re still under $500/user.

Interestingly enough, Citrix recently made a “strategic investment” in Kaviza, and has licensed their HDX high-performance video technology to them. This suggests that, at some level, Citrix does not necessarily view Kaviza as a competitive threat to XenDesktop 4.

You can view a demo of an earlier version of Kaviza on Brian Madden TV, or go right to the source and sign up for a Webinar on their upcoming v3.0 release.

App-DNA
Good Lord, if we’d only had a tool like this a few years ago. Several years ago, we worked with a major financial institution that will remain nameless (you know who you are) to build an infrastructure of what was then called Presentation Server that would serve up roughly 300 different applications to roughly 1,000 users. Application Isolation wasn’t available at the time, so we had to do things the hard way. We had a team of several engineers who spent months on application compatibility testing – not only to see which apps would run in a Presentation Server environment, but to see which apps could co-exist in a single server image. It was a huge project, and cost the customer a very large pile of money.

The App-DNA AppTitudeTM software automates the process of application compatibility testing. You give it access to the installation packages of your applications, and it will tell you which Windows desktop and/or server Operating Systems they are compatible with, whether they’re 64-bit compatible, and whether you should be able to package and stream them with XenApp’s app streaming tool or with Microsoft’s App-V. Moreover, if there’s an issue with an application, it tells you what the issue is and makes suggestions as to how you may be able to remediate it!

This product won the “Best in Show” award at Synergy, as well as winning in the “Process Improvement” category. The people I talked to couldn’t give me pricing, but if you’re looking at a major upgrade or migration that involves a lot of applications, this could be a huge time-saver.

Liquidware Labs
Their Stratusphere FitTM product was a Best of Synergy finalist in the “Business Efficiency” category (the category that was won by Kaviza). This is a VDI assessment tool. It will monitor and log a bunch of desktop OS and user performance metrics, looking at network usage, application usage, disk and memory utilization, graphics intensity, disk IOPS, network latency between the current desktop location and the data center you’re hoping to move it to, etc.

After gathering information for a while (a minimum of two weeks is recommended), it will spit out both detail and summary reports that will identify good, fair, and poor candidates for virtualization, identify potential problem areas, and help you size the back-end infrastructure that will be needed to host all of the newly-virtualized desktops.

The cost of a time-limited license (90 days, if memory serves me correctly) is roughly $7 per user. Look at it this way: You can design your VDI hosting environment by the seat of your pants, and probably end up either over- or under-building the infrastructure, or you can spend a little bit of money to develop some hard data to guide the design decisions. If it helps you avoid design mistakes, and helps insure the success of your VDI project, that’s probably money well spent.

Unidesk
The Unidesk product competes directly with the provisioning services component of XenDesktop 4. Why, you may ask, would you want to pay extra for a third party product instead of using the provisioning functionality that comes with all versions of XenDesktop 4? Here are some possible reasons:

  • Unidesk integrates patching and version management into their provisioning tool.
  • Unidesk can deliver boot-time drivers such as antivirus software, VPN software, and printer drivers as components that are separate from your master OS image.
  • Unidesk integrates application management into their provisioning tool, including applications that have been packaged for streaming via XenApp, App-V, or ThinApp.
  • The big one: Unidesk treats user-installed applications as part of “user personalization” – yes, you can provision from a single master OS image and still allow users to install their own apps. (And you can also – relatively easily – repair the damage when a user installs an app that breaks something else.)

In some organizations, user acceptance will make or break a desktop virtualization project. In a native XenDesktop 4 deployment, if you want to allow the user to install applications, you have to dedicate an OS image to that user. If this is a requirement for a lot of your users, you’re going to burn up a lot of expensive SAN storage. If internal company politics will allow you to lock down the corporate desktop, great! Your life will be much easier. And, as we’ve observed elsewhere, XenClient promises to address this by giving the user multiple desktops: a corporate desktop that’s locked down, and a personal desktop where they can install their own applications. But if you are forced, for whatever reason, to allow your users to install their own applications on top of the corporate desktop image, Unidesk could save you a bunch of storage space, and maybe even your sanity.

, , , , , , , , ,