Your are here: Home > Blog

Citrix Synchronizer and XenClient Demo

August 9th, 2010 | Posted by Shane Kalles in Citrix | Education | VDI | Virtualization | XenClient - (0 Comments)

Over the past few months, we’ve made several posts about XenClient. But in case you haven’t read them, or you need to refresh your memory, XenClient is (quoting from Citrix here): “…a high-performance, bare-metal hypervisor that runs directly on the client device hardware, dividing up the resources of the machine and enabling multiple operating systems to run side by side in complete isolation.”

Of course, there are other ways to run multiple operating systems side by side on a client device, although they may not give you the level of performance that XenClient – because of its small footprint – brings to the table. The tricky part is figuring out how to manage that environment once the user unplugs the laptop from the network and takes it on the road. How do you patch it? How do you back up user data? What do you do if the laptop is lost or stolen? If one of the OS instances is corrupted, or accidentally deleted, how do you get it back?

That’s the job of the Citrix Synchronizer – a virtual appliance that runs back in your data center and communicates with your XenClient-equipped laptops securely (via SSL) over the Internet. But rather than try to describe to you in detail exactly how that all works, it’s probably easier to simply show you. So take a few minutes to watch our own Steve Parlee demonstrate the interaction between Synchronizer and XenClient.

, , , ,

Citrix Has Your Back – Again

July 21st, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | General | Mobile Computing | Remote Access | Security | XenApp | XenDesktop - (0 Comments)

I just read an interesting blog post over on ZDnet, entitled The Changing Face of IT: Five Trends to Watch. As I read through the article, I was struck by how Citrix solutions can enable IT organizations to deal with these trends. Consider:

  1. The consumerization of IT – “Workers are bringing their own laptops and smartphones into the office and connecting them to corporate systems. More people than ever are telecommuting or working from home for a day or two a week. And, the number of Web-based tools has increased dramatically…”

    Yep. In fact many companies are instituting “BYOPC” (Bring Your Own PC) policies, because in the long run it can be less expensive to give employees a fixed allowance and allow them to buy whatever they want than it is to issue – and maintain – a company-owned laptop. Citrix themselves instituted this policy a few years ago.

    If you’re using XenApp or XenDesktop to provide access to your key line-of-business applications, you don’t care what the endpoint is. If your employee prefers a MacBook, fine. Want to use an iPad? No problem. Connecting in from your home PC because your kids are sick? We’ve got that covered, too. Just install the Citrix Receiver and you’re good to go.

  2. The borderless network – “…today’s IT security model is more about risk management than network protection. Companies have to identify their most important data and then make sure it’s protected no matter who’s accessing it and from wherever and whatever device they’re accessing it from.”

    Citrix likes to say that their products are “Secure by Design,” meaning that security is built into them from the ground up. First of all, when you’re accessing your virtual desktop remotely, or running a published application from a XenApp server, the data never leaves the data center. The remote endpoint (whatever it is) is just sending keystrokes and mouse movements to the data center and getting back pixel updates. On top of that, we can encrypt that data connection using the Citrix Access Gateway.

    Citrix also gives you very granular control over whether files can be copied between client and server, and/or whether print jobs can be directed to a client-attached printer. In fact, using Advanced Access Control policies, those controls can be context-sensitive, i.e., you might allow files to be copied to the client device if the client device is a company-owned laptop, but not if it is a home PC; or you might allow client-attached printing if the client is connecting from a branch office, but not if the same user, using the same client device, is connecting from home, or from a hotel.

  3. The cloudy data center – Let me go on record as saying that the most cloudy thing about the cloud is trying to understand what someone means when they say the word. Not unlike the word “portal” a few years ago, the first question that usually needs to be asked in any discussion about cloud computing is: “When you say ‘cloud,’ what exactly do you mean?”

    But the point to remember is that when you’re delivering applications via Citrix, users don’t know and don’t care where the data center is or where the applications are being executed. It doesn’t matter. Want to move your entire infrastructure to a co-lo? Fine. Want to have multiple data centers with automatic failover from one to the other? We can do that, too. By some definitions of the term, we’ve been building “private clouds” since the release of WinFrame back in the mid-90s.

  4. The state of outsourcing – “Outsourcing is thriving in many different forms, and it’s reasonable to expect that it will accelerate.”

    We made the point above that users don’t know and don’t care where the data center is. The fact is, for about 90% of what they need to do, neither do the administrators. Virtualization in general, and Citrix products in particular, make it very easy to administer, troubleshoot, and repair issues remotely. We built the entire Evans Fruit Company infrastructure without ever having our engineer set foot on site. In fact, actually dispatching an engineer to a customer location is now the exception rather than the rule.

  5. The mobilization paradigm – “While PCs still make sense on the desks of knowledge workers, for all of these other workers who regularly move around as part of their daily job, the stationary PC often changes the natural flow of their routine because they have to stop at a system to enter data or complete a task. That’s about to change. Mobile computers in the form of smartphones and touchscreen tablets (like the iPad) have taken a big leap forward in the past four years. They are instant-on, easy to learn because of the touchscreen, and they have a whole new ecosystem of applications designed for the touch experience…”

    Very true…but these same users are going to still need to access your traditional line-of-business applications, which will not be transformed overnight into touchscreen enabled apps. It is axiomatic that, in IT, nothing ever actually goes away – instead, new technology just gets layered over the top of old technology…which is why you’ll still find applications running on big mainframes in a lot of enterprises. So how do you manage that transition?

    Once again, Citrix comes through. There’s a Citrix Receiver for the iPhone, one for the iPad, one for Windows Mobile phones, one for the Android, and just a couple of months ago, Citrix released a version of the Receiver for BlackBerry devices. And, of course, Receivers for Windows, Mac, and Linux PCs have long been available. I don’t know of any other product or technology that offers this kind of flexibility in delivering applications to users regardless of location, connection, or endpoint device.

    6. So a big “Thank you!” to Jason Hiner for an excellent post. You’ve just described, in a nutshell, why Moose Logic is still excited to be a Citrix partner after all these years. Just remember, as you work to adapt to all of these trends that are indeed changing the IT landscape, we’ve got your back.

, , , , ,

Just Sign the Check Right Here – We’ll Fill In the Amount Later

July 20th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | Licensing | Microsoft | Virtualization | VMware | XenServer - (0 Comments)

Back in the old days of minicomputers and mainframes, we used to joke about IBM’s ability to, for all intents and purposes, get the customer to sign a blank check. They were better than anybody I’ve ever seen at getting people to commit to a solution when they really had no idea what the ultimate cost would be – and they were successful because of another cliche (which became a cliche because it was so accurate): “Nobody ever got fired for buying from IBM.” The message was basically, “Yes, we may be more expensive than everybody else, but we’ll take care of you.”

For the most part, those days are long gone, which made it all the more amazing to me to read that VMware is adopting per-VM licensing for most of its management products.

The article nails the basic problem with this licensing approach:

You know how many processors you have on a system, and that’s a fixed number. But the number of VMs on one host — let alone throughout your entire infrastructure — is regularly in flux. How do you plan your purchasing around that? And how do you make sure you don’t violate your licensing terms?

Hey, it’s easy – you just let VMware tell you what to put on your check at the end of the year:

You estimate your needs for the next year and buy licenses to meet those needs. Over the course of those 12 months, vCenter Server calculates the average number of concurrently powered-on VMs running the software. And if you end up needing more licenses to cover what you used, you just reconcile with VMware at the end of the year.

And, before you ask, no, you don’t get money back if you use fewer licenses than you originally purchased.

Sounds to me like a sweet deal – for VMware.

By comparison, the most expensive version of XenServer is $5,000 per server (not per processor, not per VM), and all of the management functionality is included. And the basic version of XenServer, which includes live motion, is free, and still includes the XenCenter distributed management software. (Here’s a helpful comparison chart of which features are included in which version of XenServer.)

A number of years ago, I attended a seminar that discussed the product adoption curve, and how products moved from the “innovation” phase to the “commodity” phase. The inflection point for a particular market was referred to as the “point of most” – where most of the products met most of the needs of most of the customers most of the time. When this point is reached, additional feature innovation no longer justifies a premium price.

The fact is that XenServer and Hyper-V are rapidly achieving feature parity with VMware. If we haven’t reached the “point of most” yet, we certainly will before much more time goes by. So even if you have a substantial investment in VMware already, at some point you have to re-examine what it’s costing every year, don’t you? Or are you OK with just signing a check and letting them fill in the amount later?

, , , , ,

The Trade Up Is Dead – Long Live the Trade Up!

July 13th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | Licensing | VDI | Virtualization | XenDesktop - (0 Comments)

As we told you many times, and in many ways, the special Citrix XenDesktop Trade-Up promotion ended on June 30. However, as we expected, Citrix has announced a new trade-up promotion. So there is still a migration path from XenApp to XenDesktop, although (as we also expected) it will cost you more than it would have had you acted before June 30.

You can still get the two-for-one deal if (1) your Subscription Advantage is current, and (2) you trade up all of your XenApp licenses.

Citrix has also extended the trade-up offer to customers who own XenApp Fundamentals (a.k.a. Access Essentials), which is great news. Under the earlier promo, these customers would have had to upgrade to XenApp Enterprise first, and then trade up to XenDesktop. Now they can trade up for the same price as customers who own XenApp Advanced Edition (although the two-for-one deal is not available for XenApp Fundamentals).

Here’s the pricing matrix for the new promo, which will run through December 31, 2010 (click graphic to view full size):

XenDesktop Trade Up Pricing, July 1 - Dec 31, 2010

XenDesktop Trade Up Pricing, July 1 - Dec 31, 2010

, , , , ,

Citrix Wins (Again)

June 25th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | General | Microsoft - (0 Comments)

Congratulations to Citrix for, once again, being awarded the Microsoft Global ISV Partner of the Year award! For those of you keeping score, that’s four times in the last eight years that the award has gone to Citrix:

  • 2003 – Citrix wins Global ISV Partner of the Year.
  • 2005 – Citrix wins Global ISV Partner of the Year.
  • 2006 – Citrix is awarded a Microsoft Information Worker Solutions Specialization award.
  • 2008 – Citrix wins Global ISV Partner of the Year.
  • 2009 – Citrix is a finalist for the Global ISV Partner of the Year.
  • 2010 – Citrix wins Global ISV Partner of the Year.

This is an outstanding record of achievement, and all our friends at Citrix deserve hearty congratulations for it – but it’s important for another reason, too. It should send a clear message to Citrix customers and prospective customers that the Citrix/Microsoft relationship is as strong as it’s ever been. In fact, you could build a case that it’s stronger, because there are more touch points in that partnership than ever before. In addition to the value XenApp brings to Remote Desktop Services, you now have:

  • Citrix Essentials for Hyper-V, which brings significant enhancements such as Site Recovery Manager to Hyper-V.
  • Branch Repeater with Windows Server – the WANscaler WAN optimization technology running on a Windows Server-based appliance, thereby giving you a single branch office appliance that can function as a local Domain Controller, a provider of important services such as DNS and DHCP, local file and print services, and provide WAN acceleration and optimization.
  • Citrix XenDesktop, which has been endorsed by Microsoft as their preferred solution for VDI.

Those of you who were around the industry in the mid-90s may recall that, during the transition from NT v3.51 to NT v4.0, there were serious doubts as to whether Citrix would even survive. But against all odds, and thanks to some intensive negotiations, Citrix and Microsoft signed the deal that led to the introduction by Microsoft of NT4, Terminal Server Edition, and Citrix MetaFrame, which added value to NT4, TSE – and set the pattern for the relationship that has continued to this day.

Nevertheless, in the late 90s, even some of the folks at Microsoft didn’t know quite what to think about Citrix. Shortly after the release of NT4, TSE, a Microsoft employee who will remain nameless (partly because I don’t remember his name, but I wouldn’t reveal it even if I did) commented to me that he didn’t understand why anyone would spend money on Citrix, because once Windows 2000 was released, no one would need it anymore. I’m happy to say that you’re unlikely to find that attitude at Microsoft today – and part of the reason is that all of those Global ISV Partner of the Year awards also sent a clear message throughout Microsoft that this was an important, strategic partnership. A large part of the credit also goes to the outstanding liaison team Citrix has placed in Redmond. And I speak from experience: since we’re also here in Microsoft’s back yard, I’ve had the privilege to get to know some of the folks on that team. They’re great people, and the state of the Citrix/Microsoft partnership today is also a reflection of the hard work they’ve put in.

The last decade has been nothing if not interesting for us Citrix partners. I’ve lost count of the number of times the rumor has resurfaced that Microsoft (or someone else) was going to buy Citrix. (I think the most recent rumor had Oracle as the buyer.) And, invariably, every time Microsoft releases another version of Windows Server, there are still those who predict that, with this version, people won’t need Citrix anymore. Yet Citrix continues to find ways to add value, grow their customer base, and continue to grow their business – and that’s also a remarkable achievement.

So here’s a big shout-out to Mark Templeton and his entire team. I’m not going to try to list names, because there are way too many to list, and I know I’d leave out someone important. Besides, you know who you are. It’s been one heck of a ride (and it’s not over yet). Thanks for letting us share it with you!

,

Seven Days and Counting

June 23rd, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Citrix | Licensing | VDI | Virtualization | XenApp | XenDesktop - (1 Comments)

Just in case you haven’t heard, there’s one week to go on the Citrix XenDesktop 4 Trade-Up Promotion. Here’s a quick recap:

  • The XenDesktop 4 Enterprise and Platinum Editions include all of the functionality of the corresponding XenApp edition. In other words, if you buy XenApp licenses today, you get XenApp. If you buy XenDesktop licenses, you get XenDesktop and XenApp.
  • …however, the license model changes: XenApp licenses have always been – and continue to be – based on concurrent use. If you own 100 XenApp licenses, it doesn’t make any difference how many users hit your XenApp farm, you’re just limited to a maximum of 100 at any given time. XenDesktop Enterprise and Platinum licenses are non-concurrent – they are either per user or per device (your choice).
  • …on the other hand, XenDesktop licenses are only about half the price per license as XenApp licenses. That means if your concurrency ratio (the ratio of total users to concurrent users) is less than 2-to-1, you’re better off buying XenDesktop licenses even if all you plan to use today is XenApp! You’ll pay less money, and you’ll have all that XenDesktop functionality in your back pocket ready to be deployed when you’re ready.
  • The current trade-up promotion allows you to convert your existing XenApp licenses to XenDesktop licenses at a price that you will probably never see again. This promotion is ending June 30.
  • If your Citrix Subscription Advantage is current, and you trade up all of your XenApp licenses, Citrix will give you two XenDesktop licenses for every XenApp license you trade up. E.g., if you have 100 XenApp licenses, your Subscription Advantage is current, and you trade up all 100 of them, you’ll end up with 200 XenDesktop licenses.
  • If your Subscription Advantage has been expired for a while, you may find that it’s less expensive to trade up to XenDesktop (which will come with a year of Subscription Advantage) than to pay the fee to get Subscription Advantage reinstated on your XenApp licenses. You won’t get the 2-for-1 deal, so you’ll have to look closely at whether the new license model will mean you have to buy additional licenses, which will obviously affect whether or not the total cost is advantageous to you, but it’s worth running the numbers to find out.
  • If the Subscription Advantage renewal on your XenApp licenses is coming due soon, consider the benefits of redirecting those renewal dollars to help pay for the trade-up. That can make an already-sweet deal even sweeter.

Citrix has a helpful on-line trade-up calculator that you can use to help you compare costs. You’ll need to enter (1) how many XenApp licenses you own, (2) how many of them you want to trade up, (3) what version of XenApp you own, (4) what version of XenDesktop you want to trade up to, and (5) whether or not your Subscription Advantage is current.

I suppose it’s possible that, come July 1, Citrix will announce that they’re extending the promotion…but I doubt it. So far, everyone I’ve talked to at Citrix has assured me that it will not be extended. I’m sure that there will still be an upgrade path after July 1, but it will cost you more money than the current promotion.

One more thing – if you’re going to do this, please don’t wait until the afternoon of June 30 to issue your purchase order! June 30 is like the “triple witching hour” – it’s end-of-month, end-of-quarter, and end-of-promotion. So it’s bound to be crazy busy in the Citrix order entry department. We’ve been requesting that all of our customers get their orders to us by end of business on the 29th, just to make sure that we can get the order placed through distribution and into Citrix’s hands before end of business in Fort Lauderdale on the 30th.

P.S.: We’re frequently asked why Citrix is making the change to non-concurrent licensing for XenDesktop. The main rationale is that if you’re looking at a serious desktop virtualization initiative, your concurrency ratio is probably going to be close to 1-to-1 anyway, so you won’t get much benefit from a concurrent license model. It also aligns more closely with the Microsoft VDI licensing model.

The important thing to remember is that if you are in that situation, you’ll actually spend less money and get more functionality for it, because the XenDesktop licenses will cost you roughly half of what it would cost to buy an equivalent number of XenApp licenses.

And if your use case is primarily to support a large pool of remote users, but you will never have more than half of them logged on at any given time, you can still purchase XenApp licenses to support those users, and they will still be concurrent use licenses.

, , , , , , ,

A First Look At XenClient

June 4th, 2010 | Posted by Steve Parlee in Citrix | VDI | Virtualization | XenClient - (1 Comments)

If you’ve following our blog for a while, you know that XenClient is the new client-side hypervisor from Citrix. It’s purpose is to allow you to take your virtual desktop with you and still have an elegant way to keep it up to date and to synch your important documents. We’ve been testing the “Release Candidate” that Citrix recently made available as a public beta.

Even though it is obviously not finished code, it’s pretty impressive!

Our Dell Latitude demo system is configured with two VMs – one Windows 7 and the other Windows XP. Further I have Access 2003 installed on the XP image and Access 2007 installed on the Win7 image and I’m “passing through” Access 2003 from the XP VM to the Win7 VM. In other words, I can “publish” an application from one desktop – in this case, I’m publishing Access 2003 from the XP desktop – and “subscribe” to it from the other desktop. In practice, this is similar in appearance to how a XenApp published application looks when it runs on the client device.

There are a couple of advantages to this. The obvious one is that an application that won’t run on Win7 can be installed on the XP desktop and made available to the Win7 desktop. A more subtle advantage is in the area of security. For example, let’s assume that the XP desktop is your “business desktop,” and is locked down such that the user has no administrative rights. Let’s further assume that the Win7 desktop is your “personal desktop,” and you have the rights to do whatever you want with it – which could include getting infected with malware. But the applications running on the business desktop cannot be affected by malware on the personal desktop – even if they’re being passed through.

In an earlier blog post, we linked to a Citrix TV video that demonstrated this “secure application sharing.” In that video, they’ve deliberately infected one desktop with a keylogger. You can see that any interaction with a browser running on that desktop is being logged by the keylogger. However, a browser session that is running on the other desktop, but being passed through to the infected desktop, is immune to the keylogger. Pretty cool.

With regards to functionality, I’m very hopeful that Citrix will fix some of the issues we’ve seen in the RC. Here are some of the things we’ve seen reported on the Citrix on-line forums, some of which we’ve seen ourselves:

  • Many people are finding hardware problems with simple devices such as mice even for hardware on the Hardware Compatibility List. Smart cards are also an issue.
  • XenClient requires that a few different Virtualization technologies be present in order to function correctly, so today the HCL is pretty limited. This should be improving each day but it is still something to watch out for so be sure to check the HCL carefully. There is an HCL included with the XenClient 1.0 RC User Guide.
  • HDX (High Definition) video/audio:
    • If you run both a corporate Desktop and a Personal desktop at the same time, only one VM can have HDX running at a time – and to switch HDX functionality between VMs you have to shut them down…it cannot be done on the fly. This is unfortunate because without HDX, video is really choppy and difficult to watch. Citrix has already said this will not change before RTM (Release to Manufacturing).
    • If you are taking advantage of the feature we described earlier where you publish an application from one desktop and subscribe to it from the other, you can have HDX running in the subscribing desktop, but not in the publishing desktop.
  • We’ve not yet been able to do a successful physical-to-virtual (“P2V”) migration of a desktop OS into the XenClient environment. Citrix has said it will release a version of XenConvert that will be able to do this, but they say it probably won’t be until after RTM.
  • Integrated video cams do not work. This could be a significant issue, since the product is aimed at “road warriors” and many of them will want to use a cam for meeting. It supposedly supports USB video cams, but we have not yet tested this. However, I’m concerned that many users will push back on having to carry an extra peripheral with them. We’ve been told by Citrix that this should be working by RTM.
  • OS Snapshots are not available yet but should be in a future release.
  • No support for 64 bit guests yet.
  • Graphic support for non-Intel graphic chip sets is limited.

Still, this is shaping up to be a great product that will make life easier for many a desktop administrator. If you’ve ever had to manage desktops, you’ve had to deal with this “Catch-22:”

  1. My users are breaking their desktops…I need to lock them down.
  2. When I lock them down, I end up with managers in my face because they can’t install their favorite (fill in the blank).
  3. I back off and give them local admin rights so they can install (fill in the blank).
  4. Return to Step 1, repeat ad nauseum.

XenClient gives us a glimmer of hope that we may be able, sometime soon, to break out of this cycle!

, , , ,

XenApp – Beyond Application Virtualization

May 28th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Application streaming | Application Virtualization | Citrix | Virtualization | XenApp - (0 Comments)

A couple of days ago, in the post entitled “What Is Application Virtualization?” I made the statement that, although application virtualization is a component of XenApp, and has been since the release of Presentation Server v4.5, XenApp is more than just application virtualization. To fully understand what I mean by that, you need to understand the Citrix vision of how applications should be delivered to users.

Over the years, there have been a lot of ways to connect client devices to server-based applications and desktops: Program Neighborhood, Program Neighborhood Agent, “Project Charlotte” which became Nfuse which became Web Interface, etc., etc. But if you look back over the last 15+ years, you will see an evolution toward the Citrix vision of “Any” – any application, to any device, anytime, anywhere, over any kind of connection – and you will see an ongoing effort to make it simple and easy for users to access the applications they need, as well as easier for the IT staff to deliver the right applications to the right users.

In Citrix’s view, the delivery of applications to users should be as simple as the delivery of broadcast content over your satellite TV network. Think about that model for a moment – you generally don’t have to worry about whether you have a big or small TV set, or whether it has a traditional picture tube (yes, there are still some of those around), an LCD screen, or a Plasma screen…because you have a receiver that conforms to an accepted standard, and that will connect to any TV. You bring the TV home, take it out of the carton, and connect it to your satellite receiver, and with little or no additional configuration, you can watch the channels you’ve subscribed to. And you get to decide what you watch and when. If you have a DVR built into your receiver (as most do these days), you can even cache the programming content and watch it later.

The current Citrix delivery method is darned close to this, and completely unique in the market, in my opinion. There are four basic components:

  • The Citrix Receiver, together with several plug-ins for the Receiver.
  • The Citrix Merchandising Server, which is a virtual appliance designed to run on either XenServer or VMware. My expectation is that it will also soon be ported to Hyper-V.
  • Citrix Dazzle, which is a mechanism for user self-service.
  • Citrix Update Service, which is an on-line service provided by Citrix that is responsible for notifying Merchandising Servers of available plug-in updates.

Let’s look at these in turn, then see how they all play together.

Receiver
Citrix used to have a lot of separate clients, that all had to be installed separately. You had a client for XenApp. You had another client for XenDesktop. You had one for the Access Gateway, one for Single Sign On (a.k.a. Password Manager), one for Branch Repeater acceleration, one for receiving streamed apps – you get the picture. It was getting a little ridiculous, not to mention difficult to manage, and cluttered up your System tray with multiple little icons. By contrast, the Receiver is a sort of “universal client” that is responsible for managing a variety of plug-ins on the client desktop. Instead of multiple client icons in your System Tray, you’ll have just one – the Receiver. The plug-ins are modules of client functionality that are managed by the Receiver. At the moment, you have plug-ins for:

  • Secure Access (for Access Gateway Enterprise Edition)
  • Secure Access (for Access Gateway Standard Edition)
  • Online Plug-in (for XenApp hosted applications/desktops and connecting to XenDesktop-managed virtual PCs)
  • Offline Plug-in (for streamed applications)
  • App-V Plug-in (for Microsoft App-V streamed applications)
  • Communications Plug-in (for EasyCall)
  • Acceleration Plug-in (Branch repeater)
  • Service Monitoring Plug-in (enables Edgesight for Endpoints to gather data from the client)
  • Profile Management Plug-in (enables Citrix Profile Manager)
  • Dazzle Plug-in (enables application self-service via the Dazzle interface)

Merchandising Server
The Merchandising Server is the virtual appliance responsible for managing and delivering the Receiver and its various plug-ins to end users. The Merchandising Server can contact the Citrix Update Service via the Internet and download the latest versions of the Receiver and plug-ins. Once you have those, you create rules that stipulate what the Merchandising Server will push to different users as they authenticate, depending on such parameters as Machine Name, User Domain Membership, Machine Domain Membership, Operating System, and IP Address Range.

The first time the user connects, s/he will point a browser at a designated URL and enter login credentials, and the Merchandising Server will push down the specified package, which will be automatically installed. One installed, the Receiver will periodically check back with the Merchandising Server for updates, so you can dynamically add, remove, or update plug-ins as required.

Dazzle
Dazzle is a new variation on the old Program Neighborhood Agent theme that enables user self-service. Those who have worked with Citrix technology for a while will remember that the PN Agent communicated “behind the scenes” with a special Web Interface site to retrieve a list of the published applications available to the user. Icons for those applications could be pushed onto the Start Menu, or accessed by right-clicking on the PN Agent icon in the System Tray. The Dazzle plug-in also communicates with a special Web Interface site, but allows the user to open a window, view the available applications, and select the ones s/he wants to use (see below):

Dazzle User Experience

Dazzle User Experience


Applications can be organized into multiple “Stores” by the Administrator, and can be tagged to appear in a “Featured” list to draw the user’s attention. There’s a friendly description of each available application, and a column that indicates whether that application will work offline (i.e., whether it will be streamed to the client machine) – and, by the way, it doesn’t matter whether the app was packaged for streaming using the Citrix tools or using Microsoft’s App-V, so long as you’ve delivered the correct plug-in to them. Applications that are not tagged as working offline are, by implication, going to be executed on a XenApp server, and therefore will only be available when the client has connectivity to the XenApp server farm.

The user can browse through the list, or use a search function, which is extremely valuable in an enterprise that may have dozens – or even hundreds – of applications. To select an application, the user simply clicks on the “Add” button. The selected applications will appear in a “Dazzle Apps” folder on the Start Menu tree:

Dazzle Apps Folder

The Dazzle Apps Folder


So let’s summarize what we have with this system:

  • Administrators can easily publish applications, and organize them into “App Stores.” Applications from multiple server farms can be integrated into a single App Store, or multiple App Stores can be created as desired (e.g., one for Human Resources, one for Engineering, etc.).
  • Users no longer have to install or configure anything – all required client software is transparently pushed out to them and installed, and automatically updated, by the Merchandising Server.
  • Users can help themselves to the applications they need to be productive, and to only those applications. Just because an application is available to them doesn’t necessarily mean they will have an icon for that application cluttering up their desktop or Start Menu.

I don’t think that application delivery can get much easier than that.

And why, you may ask, is User Self-Service something you should be concerned about? Well, in addition to the obvious fact that is makes life easier for both your users and your IT staff, take a peek at the following video. Increasingly, these are the people you are going to want to attract and retain as employees. They’ve grown up with technology, and they have their own preferred ways of using it to be productive. Here’s what they had to say about corporate computing:

This is why I contend that XenApp is substantially more than just application virtualization, and substantially more than “something I add to my Remote Desktop Servers to make things run faster.” It is a new and unique way of delivering to your users the applications they want and need, and only those applications, with minimal muss and fuss on both ends of the transactions. Increasingly, your users are used to the self-service model (e.g., the Apple on-line store), they find it intuitive, and they like it. It enables BYOC (“Bring Your Own Computer”) policies. It makes life simpler for everyone. And no one else has anything like it at the moment.

If this has caught your interest and you’d like to see more detail, check out the video below. It’s a bit long (about 30 minutes), but does an excellent job of explaining how everything works:

, , , , ,

What Is Application Virtualization?

May 26th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Application streaming | Application Virtualization | Citrix | Microsoft | Virtualization | VMware | XenApp - (2 Comments)

Some folks out there are still scratching their heads over the Citrix decision to change the name of Presentation Server to XenApp. There were actually several reasons for that change. For one thing, we’ve all seen Remote Desktop Services (formerly known as Terminal Services) get better and better with every release of Windows Server – and don’t think for a minute that Citrix didn’t see that coming. As closely as they work with Microsoft, of course they did. So it became obvious to Citrix long ago that they needed a better value proposition for their product than “something that I add to Terminal Services to get better performance.”

In point of fact, Citrix does have a considerably better value proposition than that – but not everyone was “getting it.” One way to help people get it is to re-frame the conversation by repositioning the product, and sometimes changing the product name can help make that happen.

But why XenApp? Well, that goes back to the acquisition of XenSource a few years ago. It seems that, after making that aquisition, Citrix decided that, in their vocabulary, “Xen” = “Virtualization.” Therefore…

  • “XenServer” = “Server Virtualization”
  • “XenDesktop” = “Desktop Virtualization”
  • “XenApp” = “Application Virtualization”

But does it, really? (XenApp, I mean.) Well, sort of. These days, application virtualization is a component of XenApp, but XenApp is more than just application virtualization.

Which brings me back to the question: What is application virtualization? I would suggest, as a good working definition, that, just as server virtualization is the abstraction of a server operating system from the underlying hardware, application virtualization is the abstraction of an application from the operating system it’s executing on.

We virtualize servers by interposing a layer of software – the hypervisor – between the hardware and the operating system. Although some operating systems, like Windows Server 2008, are virtualization-aware, meaning that they know when they’re running on a hypervisor and modify their behavior accordingly, earlier OS versions had to be fooled into thinking that they were running directly on server hardware when in fact they were not.

Applications today are still at the stage of development where they have to be fooled into thinking that they’ve been installed normally when in fact they have not. When they’re installed, applications typically write specific information to specific locations in the Windows registry. They place .DLL files into specific folders (most frequently into C:\Windows\System32) – and sometimes these .DLL files overwrite or conflict with others, which is why you can’t, for example, run two different versions of Microsoft Access on the same PC workstation without some kind of application virtualization. Application virtualization places a sort of “software wrapper” around the application – sometimes referred to as an “isolation environment,” or a “sandbox.” It causes these Registry keys and files to be written to an application specific location, and redirects the application calls so they can be found when the application executes.

By contrast, when an application is executed via Remote Desktop Services (with or without the involvement of XenApp), you’re really virtualizing the presentation of the application. The application is executing on the server, and the user interface is being presented remotely at a client device, using a protocol such as RDP (Microsoft) or ICA (Citrix) to transport keystrokes and mouse movements from the client to the server, and screen updates from the server to the client.

In the old days – and often today as well – that application was installed directly on the Remote Desktop server. Today, we can instead use application virtualization to deliver the application to the server for execution on demand rather than installing the application in advance in the traditional way. But it’s important to understand that presentation virtualization – running the application in one place and displaying the user interface in another – is not the same thing as application virtualization, which, as we have defined it, has to do with how that application is installed on the desired execution platform and how it behaves when it executes.

The first product to do application virtualization on a large scale for Windows apps was Softricity, by a company called SoftGrid. Softricity evolved into App-V after Microsoft acquired SoftGrid. App-V not only virtualizes the application as described above, it also allows the application to be streamed on demand to the computer that needs to execute it. Application streaming works better than you might think, because it turns out that for most Windows apps, most of the code is seldom (if ever) used. (Just think of all the arcane features in Word or Excel that the average user will probably never use.) So we can stream down just enough code to get the user interface up and running, and continue to stream additional code in the background as features are actually required.

The combination of (1) not having to explicitly install applications on workstations (or Citrix servers, for that matter), and (2) not having to worry about applications conflicting with one another can make life much easier for the IT staff:

  • You no longer have to run around from workstation to workstation with a backpack full of installation CDs.
  • It can potentially eliminate the old practice of having multiple “silos” of servers within a Citrix server farm to run applications that would not play nicely with one another.
  • It makes image management for both workstations and XenApp servers much simpler, because if all of your applications are baked into your OS image, then any application change requires that you change (and regression test) your OS image – but if a streamed application changes, all you have to change is that application.

Meanwhile, back in Fort Lauderdale, Citrix had been working on its own approach to application isolation, which was added to the Enterprise and Platinum editions of Presentation Server when v4.0 was released. This “Application Isolation Environment” then evolved into application streaming with the release of Presentation Server v4.5. For those who are familiar with the Citrix application publishing paradigm, you can now:

  • Run the application through the Citrix packaging utility
  • Park the resulting package on a shared folder that’s accessible by your target machines
  • Step through the process of publishing the application, with a new twist: “I want to make this application available to this group of users, on this set of XenApp servers, and here’s the path to the application package.”

NOTE: Yes, I know that not all applications can be successfully packaged for streaming. But most modern Windows applications can be. Yes, you’ll have to test your apps, or, if you have a lot of apps, use a tool like AppDNA to analyze them for compatibility.

Administrative options allow you to specify whether an application package will be streamed to a XenApp server to be executed there, or streamed directly to the client PC to be executed there, or conditionally streamed (e.g., stream to the client PC if a particular set of criteria is satisfied, otherwise execute the app via XenApp). You can also stream it and cache it on the client PC so, in the case of a laptop, it can be disconnected from the network and continue to run the app for a specified period of time.

So, in a sense, the application virtualization component of XenApp competes with App-V. Prior to the release of XenApp 6, our advice would have been to use XenApp to package and stream apps if your need was primarily to serve up apps to Citrix users, and use App-V if Citrix represented only a small piece of your infrastructure and you primarily needed to package and stream apps to Windows-based workstations. This was mostly based on the fact that App-V needed its own servers to control publishing and streaming of the applications – so if your primary need was to deliver apps to XenApp users, it didn’t make sense to build that App-V control infrastructure when your Citrix farm already had everything you needed to stream apps via XenApp.

One of the features of XenApp 6, however, is the ability to deliver App-V packages through the Citrix application publishing infrastructure, without having to build out the App-V back-end server infrastructure. So now you can use whichever packaging tool you prefer with your Citrix infrastructure. If your staff is more familiar with – or just prefers – App-V, it’s not a problem, because XenApp will support those packages natively.

A discussion of application virtualization wouldn’t be complete without mentioning VMware’s ThinApp. A while back, VMware, seeing which way the competitive winds were blowing, realized it needed an application virtualization solution of its own, so it went out and bought one. In addition to packaging and streaming, ThinApp can also wrap an application up as a free-standing executable, meaning that you could theoretically carry the entire Microsoft Office suite with you on a USB stick, and plug it into any Windows PC anywhere regardless of whether (or which version of) Office was installed on that PC. Of course, if you actually did that with a PC that wasn’t already legally licensed for Office, you’re violating your Microsoft Office license, but I digress.

There are other application virtualization products in the marketplace, but at the moment, the “big three” are App-V, ThinApp, and XenApp. However, as I said way back in the beginning of this post, XenApp is more than just application virtualization. And that will be the subject of my next post.

, , , , , , , ,

Five Cool Products from Synergy 2010

May 18th, 2010 | Posted by Sid Herron in Application streaming | Application Virtualization | Citrix | Citrix Synergy | Provisioning Services | VDI | Virtualization | XenDesktop - (1 Comments)

As many readers know, I spent last week attending back-to-back Citrix conferences in San Francisco. Monday and Tuesday (“Summit”) was for Citrix Partners, Wednesday through Friday (“Synergy”) was for the larger user community. In the coming days, I expect to be writing a lot about stuff I learned there – to the extent that I can without violating the Non-Disclosure Agreement that all attendees agree to as part of the registration process.

Today’s post is about five cool products that I think are worthy of further investigation. I should stress that, aside from Wyse, we do not currently sell any of these vendors’ products, and we may or may not partner with them in the future. So this should not be interpreted as an endorsement other than to say that these products intrigued me and I believe them to be worth looking into.

Wyse XenithTM “Zero Client”
Finally, a non-Windows-based thin-client device with HDX MediaStream video support! I can hardly wait for us to get our hands on one of these for testing. Up until now, if you wanted high performance video, you needed to buy a Windows-embedded thin-client, and install the same Citrix Receiver and plug-ins that you would install on a full-blown desktop PC. And, unfortunately, a Windows-embedded thin-client can easily cost as much as a low-end PC. While I don’t have firm cost numbers yet, I was told it would be “sub-$300” (which I assume to mean $299).

At the Wyse demo, they plugged in the box, turned it on, it auto-discovered the XenDesktop infrastructure and automatically configured itself accordingly, and was ready to use literally in a few seconds. Wow.

Kaviza’s “VDI-In-a-Box”
Kaviza has an intriguing product. It won the “Best of Synergy” award in the “Business Efficiency” category. As the product name implies, they make a virtual appliance that handles the provisioning, load-balancing, and management of virtual desktops in a single package. Their original appliance was designed to run on VMware, but the Beta of v3.0 they were showing at Synergy will run on XenServer. They do not require shared storage (i.e., a SAN), or a separate connection broker. When you add more of their appliances, their “grid” automatically reconfigures itself to incorporate the new appliances, replicating desktop template images as required.

They’re positioning this as an SMB solution – up to a couple hundred desktops. If you’re going to grow beyond that, you’re probably going to want the greater storage efficiency of storing your desktop images on a SAN and using the provisioning services of XenDesktop 4. Also, this is specifically a VDI solution, by which I mean a bunch of virtual PCs running on one or more virtualization hosts. As we’ve discussed in other posts, VDI is only one kind of desktop virtualization. If you want the flexibility of being able to leverage all the different kinds of desktop virtualization, XenDesktop gives you that flexibility.

Suggested list price is $125 per concurrent user. Citrix has a VDI-only version of XenDesktop (which does include provisioning services, but does not include any other form of desktop virtualization) which lists for $95 per named user, or $195 per concurrent user. So, taking into account the cost savings from reducing the back-end infrastructure requirements, Kaviza is certainly competitive for smaller deployments, if you’re looking for strictly a VDI solution. Kavisa estimates that, including the virtualization hosts, you’re still under $500/user.

Interestingly enough, Citrix recently made a “strategic investment” in Kaviza, and has licensed their HDX high-performance video technology to them. This suggests that, at some level, Citrix does not necessarily view Kaviza as a competitive threat to XenDesktop 4.

You can view a demo of an earlier version of Kaviza on Brian Madden TV, or go right to the source and sign up for a Webinar on their upcoming v3.0 release.

App-DNA
Good Lord, if we’d only had a tool like this a few years ago. Several years ago, we worked with a major financial institution that will remain nameless (you know who you are) to build an infrastructure of what was then called Presentation Server that would serve up roughly 300 different applications to roughly 1,000 users. Application Isolation wasn’t available at the time, so we had to do things the hard way. We had a team of several engineers who spent months on application compatibility testing – not only to see which apps would run in a Presentation Server environment, but to see which apps could co-exist in a single server image. It was a huge project, and cost the customer a very large pile of money.

The App-DNA AppTitudeTM software automates the process of application compatibility testing. You give it access to the installation packages of your applications, and it will tell you which Windows desktop and/or server Operating Systems they are compatible with, whether they’re 64-bit compatible, and whether you should be able to package and stream them with XenApp’s app streaming tool or with Microsoft’s App-V. Moreover, if there’s an issue with an application, it tells you what the issue is and makes suggestions as to how you may be able to remediate it!

This product won the “Best in Show” award at Synergy, as well as winning in the “Process Improvement” category. The people I talked to couldn’t give me pricing, but if you’re looking at a major upgrade or migration that involves a lot of applications, this could be a huge time-saver.

Liquidware Labs
Their Stratusphere FitTM product was a Best of Synergy finalist in the “Business Efficiency” category (the category that was won by Kaviza). This is a VDI assessment tool. It will monitor and log a bunch of desktop OS and user performance metrics, looking at network usage, application usage, disk and memory utilization, graphics intensity, disk IOPS, network latency between the current desktop location and the data center you’re hoping to move it to, etc.

After gathering information for a while (a minimum of two weeks is recommended), it will spit out both detail and summary reports that will identify good, fair, and poor candidates for virtualization, identify potential problem areas, and help you size the back-end infrastructure that will be needed to host all of the newly-virtualized desktops.

The cost of a time-limited license (90 days, if memory serves me correctly) is roughly $7 per user. Look at it this way: You can design your VDI hosting environment by the seat of your pants, and probably end up either over- or under-building the infrastructure, or you can spend a little bit of money to develop some hard data to guide the design decisions. If it helps you avoid design mistakes, and helps insure the success of your VDI project, that’s probably money well spent.

Unidesk
The Unidesk product competes directly with the provisioning services component of XenDesktop 4. Why, you may ask, would you want to pay extra for a third party product instead of using the provisioning functionality that comes with all versions of XenDesktop 4? Here are some possible reasons:

  • Unidesk integrates patching and version management into their provisioning tool.
  • Unidesk can deliver boot-time drivers such as antivirus software, VPN software, and printer drivers as components that are separate from your master OS image.
  • Unidesk integrates application management into their provisioning tool, including applications that have been packaged for streaming via XenApp, App-V, or ThinApp.
  • The big one: Unidesk treats user-installed applications as part of “user personalization” – yes, you can provision from a single master OS image and still allow users to install their own apps. (And you can also – relatively easily – repair the damage when a user installs an app that breaks something else.)

In some organizations, user acceptance will make or break a desktop virtualization project. In a native XenDesktop 4 deployment, if you want to allow the user to install applications, you have to dedicate an OS image to that user. If this is a requirement for a lot of your users, you’re going to burn up a lot of expensive SAN storage. If internal company politics will allow you to lock down the corporate desktop, great! Your life will be much easier. And, as we’ve observed elsewhere, XenClient promises to address this by giving the user multiple desktops: a corporate desktop that’s locked down, and a personal desktop where they can install their own applications. But if you are forced, for whatever reason, to allow your users to install their own applications on top of the corporate desktop image, Unidesk could save you a bunch of storage space, and maybe even your sanity.

, , , , , , , , ,